Is it any wonder that the print journalistic media are going out of business in record numbers of late? Their refusal, and the refusal of most of their liberal broadcast brethren, to cover legitimate stories of a non-liberal bent (a despicable process called “slanting” or “propagandizing” rather than doing real journalism) leaves that happy job open to the internet and to FOX broadcast news and the talk radio shows and all have been responding to the challenge admirably.

The New York Times famously subtitles their rag, “All the News that’s Fit to Print” as their masthead logo. Of course it’s a terrible lie, the Times has for at least 55 years only printed less than one half of all the news that’s fit to print. This is the price you pay when your editorial policy is to slant every story to fit your publisher’s ultra-liberal bias. The Times is just one small part of the problem, of course. In their sainted ivory-towered offices the Obama-protecting Barak-worshipers of Main Stream Media (MSM) as a whole look to be committing the cardinal sin of the news business: missing out on important stories. 

Right now when it comes to having a “newspaper of record” in the United States that honor falls to USA Today, which unfortunately is only a weekday newspaper: certainly the NY Times has abdicated all right to that lofty title. The fact is that the liberal media, MSM if you will, has entirely failed to vett Obama himself . . . if they had done that job as good journalists must, they would have found Van Jones to be an Obama Clone nothing more . . . and that neither Obama nor Jones is fit to wear the mantle of public official. But, of course, liberals are never challenged by the NY Times or other MSM -- that would be high treason. 

The MSM can’t seem to get their story straight about Van Jones. Some like Tom Brokaw insist that Van Jones was a good man “railroaded unfairly by the uncontrolled, irresponsible internet nut cases and crazy FOX.” Meanwhile the Washington Post claims that Obama’s vetting policies are to blame and rues the fact that “the resignation will prove a distraction" to the important work of passing Obama’s health care reform initiative.

In the wake of their refusal to vett and even thoroughly interview ex-Obama Green Czar Van Jones or even to properly cover the story of his demise (because he was a czar and not vettable by the FBI and the legislative branch, it was their very important job to find up what’s what with Mr. Van Jones and all 36 of the Obama Czars – Rajjpuut must reiterate:  that job has NOT been done yet) . . . it now appears the MSM has been reduced, as David Limbaugh put it, to “sputtering incoherence” and is about to miss another scoop. And what scoop is that? Who or What does it involve?

                Call it “GE-Gate,” call it “Obama-Payola,” call it “Rent-a-Senator” . . . whatever you call it, hearken back to the days of proud smokestack America when an idealistic young actor was serving as spokesman for and signing off from one of the most popular shows on television, General Electric Theater with his signal anthem: “At General Electric where progress is our most important product.”

That young actor, a union-paying Democrat and later union president before coming to GE, was so impressed by the corporate culture, integrity and sense of purpose at General Electric that he eventually became a conservative and later served as Governor of California and President of the United States. While in the oval office he helped win the Cold War, end the Warsaw Pact and the USSR and Eastern-European communism while bringing the Berlin Wall crashing down. Those were the halcyon days when General Electric really commanded respect. Oh, how the mighty have fallen. Rajjpuut doubts very much that Ronald Reagan would be proud to serve as GE spokesman nowadays . . . .

                Today, once mighty GE, proudest long-time resident atop the Dow Jones 30 Industrial Stocks, is in the butt-kissing and apple-polishing business full time with none other than the nation’s first black president . . . a charismatic speaker and out-and-out charmer who promised to “. . . clean up Washington” and “run the most open, transparent and accountable administration in the country’s history.”

                 “. . . clean up Washington” and “run the most open, transparent and accountable administration in the country’s history.” Memorable words, unfortunately NOT SO the deeds!

The only question now is, “What's the going rate to buy one U.S. Senator's vote for the most important event in corrupt-new suddenly Eco-conscious GE’s life?” Will it take $50,000 or $75, 000 or $100,000 each to pass the “cap and trade Waxman-Markey bill?” Forbid it almighty God, I know not what course the pikers may take, but for real payola, hold out for $200,000 minimum!

Once mighty General Electric has spent so much money buying influence in Washington that it’s now become a one-penny-dividend stock. That’s right, it’s last dividend was one whole penny. Oh, for the glory years when retired teachers, store clerks and profligate Hollywood celebrities could survive and thrive on the large steady dividends from GE. But somehow they've gotten diverted from their old sense of corporate purpose. 

General Electric spent more on lobbying in the second quarter of this year than any other company, according to federal lobbying files. Since 1998, GE has been the undefeated long-term champion of lobbying excesses, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, outpacing its runner-up by 40 percent in the last decade plus. Meanwhile GEPAC has become perhaps the shadiest political action committee in a mighty shady town. Tying the lobbying and PAC effort together, is the noble profession of Vice Chairman John G. Rice who, poor baby, may be suffering from “Deep-Throatitis” since a secret corporate e-mail he wrote was recently leaked to the press and revealed embarrassing strategic goals and tactics all based upon supporting Barak Obama and buying votes for GE-favoring measures. This in itself is perhaps only playing hard ball with a nine-pounder cannon . . . however, GE besides owning a financial arm that recently received $139 Billion dollars in federal bailout funds courtesy of the Obama administration . . . most sinister fact of all: GE also owns NBC and all its Obama-praising affiliates such as MSNBC and CNBC.

While it may have been obvious during the presidential campaign that MSNBC news was incapable of mouthing anything less than glowing praise for Barak Obama . . . their closet relationship has come out into the open courtesy of the aforementioned leaked memo GE Vice Chairman Rice wrote in that Aug. 19 e-mail to his colleagues at GE. First a bit more background . . . .

                In the most blatant and shameless sell-out in American journalistic history, Barak Obama now “owns” MSNBC journalistic coverage of Himself and scratching the back that scratches his: General Electric (GE: MSNBC’s parent company) now “owns” the inside track on all cap-and-trade contracts; global warming contracts; green job contracts; and, oh yes, bailout money for the nearly bankrupt** General Electric during the Obama administration. GE, of course, has already received $139 Billion dollars in federal bailout funds for its financial arm.

                It appears that this “open scandal” is no surprise to anyone. The other liberal-leaning networks aren’t commenting, however, so the only party-pooper in the crowd is conservative channel Fox News. The MSNBC-Obama mutual back-scratching act is so blatant that Barak himself made light of it at the Radio and TV correspondent’s dinner when he said, he was trying to come up with ideas for his comments at the gathering and couldn't sleep. But suddenly he knew where to go for help. So he just rolled over in bed and asked Brian Williams for his opinion.

                If you watch political news at all, it’s no secret that the Fox Network is on Barak Obama’s enemies list; and that MSNBC, owned by GE, is easily the most pro-Obama TV news department in the whole country. In a land of left-leaning antennae, MSNBC could just as well change its name to the “Barak Network” and no would notice or raise an eyebrow.

There was one instance during the presidential campaign when light criticism of Barack the Beloved resulted in a wrist slap and another in March of 2009 when some of their CNBC financial analysts began criticizing Obama and his proposed programs (“a spending spree” according to one pundit) -- the typical government spending boondoggles GSBs liberals are famous for. Virtually immediately GE CEO Jeff Immelt and NBC President Jeff Zucker both dropped in on aforesaid commentators to inform them as to the weather: “Boys, this is how the wind blows around here . . .” 

Apparently the “re-orientation chat” worked. Since that time criticism, even subtle criticism of Obama the candidate or Obama the president has been non-existent. Their bias for Obama had always been outrageous, but today Zucker and Immelt have become Obama’s trick ponies and President Obama is deified at least three times daily on each NBC affiliate company. Other than Obama getting unlimited use of NBC teleprompters during the campaign and later as president, no one could be sure exactly what the tie in was. Up till late August the nature of their “pact” was still anybody’s guess. Let’s look at three examples of the suspicious nature of the relationship:

1.        GE is relying on the Obama administration to come through on a promise that all American health records could by law only be computerized with GE and its supposedly “superior technology” having the inside track for a contract that would bring in billions. When word of this “cozy relationship was first aired in early August, Obama began showing a bit less favoritism at news conferences and even invited ABC in for one-on-one interviewing. Instead of a whole slew of government contracts, however, GE might be cruising for a bruising. Fox commentator Bill O’Reilly opined recently that any important contract for GE

“would make Watergate look like a Shirley Temple movie.” If that is the case, then one video clip that will make every highlight reel will be Kareem Dale (Special Asst. to Obama) smiling, “At the White House, as we always like to say, we love MSNBC.”

2.      GE appointed former Senator Tom Daschle to its health advisory board. Daschle, President Obama's nominee for secretary of Health and Human Services until a tax scandal derailed him, has strong connections to the Obama White House. So obviously there is a huge potential conflict of interest here. NBC News is in on the “hear no evil, see no evil, SPEAK no evil” take for Obama, even as GE, the parent company, is aiming to corral billions from the federal government. Hard to believe that MSNBC has only run positive spin stories on Obamacare for the last 11 ½ weeks isn’t it? NBC, was once renowned for the high ethical tone of its (liberal) news coverage but now with Zuckerman, Immelt and Daschle running point for the news gatherers, all you can hear is poisonous left-wing fanaticism supporting the president unerringly. Literally, sneezing or partial eye-rolling while reporting an Obama story is now a capital offense at NBC.

3.      GE, the once mighty Dow Jones Smokestack America Industrial giant who’s dividends were all any frugal retiree every needed, is now (unless the White House comes through) moving toward not just penny dividends, but actual penny stock status unless the White House comes through for them. To arrest that slide they have created a whole new strategy arm called “Ecomagination” which is plotting to win a wide array of ecology-themed contracts associated with global warming, green-tech, and cap and trade legislation. It all comes down on the “Obama connection,” will the president come through?

The connections that were assumed are now obvious, the August 19 e-mail memo from GE Vice Chairman Rice made it all official . . . .

"The intersection between GE's interests and government action is clearer than ever," Vice Chairman John G. Rice wrote in his August 19, 2009 e-mail to colleagues. He was calling on all GE people and GE subsidiary people to join GEPAC, the General Electric Political Action Committee. "GEPAC is an important tool that enables GE employees to collectively help support candidates who share the values and goals of GE,” that is, as the e-mail continued:   sharing the values and goals of GE means “support for policies that profit the company.”

Rice continues by getting specific about climate change, "we were able to work closely with key authors of the Waxman-Markey climate and energy bill, recently passed by the House of Representatives. If this bill is enacted into law it would benefit many GE businesses."

GE has put almost all its eggs into the Waxman-Markey basket. W-M would profit GE Greenhouse Gas Services, which deals in greenhouse gas credits, products that have value only if a cap-and-trade bill like Waxman-Markey passes. That is if W-M fails, GM is up the creek. Rice did not pull any punches, "Our Company is heavily impacted by a number of issues pending in Washington this fall.”

GE spent more on lobbying in the second quarter of this year than did any other company, according to federal lobbying files. Since 1998, GE has been the leading lobbier, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, outpacing its runner-up by 40 percent. Tying the lobbying and PAC effort together, Rice said, " . . .we must also make sure that candidates who share GE's values and goals get elected to office . . ."

Six House members have received more than $4,000 from GEPAC this cycle -- all Democrats -- Representative John Murtha, D-Pa., faces a tough re-election next year, thanks to accusations that he has used his chairmanship of the Defense Appropriations subcommittee to benefit donors and patrons. GE is a top defense contractor.

The other big recipients are all incumbents in powerful positions, presumably safe for now: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Budget Committee Chairman John Spratt, House Majority Whip Steny Hoyer, Ways and Means member Richard Neal, who chairs the subcommittee on Select Revenue Measures, and key appropriator Norm Ducks**. This year two-thirds of GEPAC money has gone to Democrats, but during the 2008 elections, recipients were pretty equally divided.

Why would GE give $15,000 to every senatorial candidate regardless of party in the last election? Obviously, it was not because they cared so much who won, but rather because this way they had an “in” with the winner, whoever he/she was. The process is called “Rent-Seeking” which means: Lobbying and contributing to campaign funds so that favorable government legislation or regulation; or defeat of unfavorable legislation or regulation happens precisely in the manner most calculated to generate huge profits for the company which ordinary free market interchanges could never provide. 

Obama is “The Prince” of the 21^st Century and he has read and re-read and re-re-read his Machiavelli . . . .

“An Obama Primer”

“Lesson 1: How to Overthrow the U.S. Government”

                Should YOU ever decide that it’s important to YOU to bring down the American way of life and their political and economic system, for instance to replace it with a better system such as Marxism, the process is really quite simple. It isn’t easy, of course, but it is simple, direct and easily understood.

First, YOU MUST create a straw-man, an internal enemy that all manner of accusations can be made about . . . an un-American enemy . . . and YOU have to pound that enemy’s name and practices into the public consciousness. The Constitution is, using this enemy as a fall guy, undermined at every opportunity while the Constitution becomes YOUR chief source of weaponry against the straw-man. Accusation becomes undeniable guilt.  Everything blurs sweetly so that right or wrong is a judgment YOU make and nothing else.

Obama’s straw-men are the knuckle-dragging Republicans who, he says “created the mess we’re in’**and especially the more vocal Nazis among them.

Tail-gunner Joe McCarthy of the Communist Witch Hunt infamy almost got the formula correct. Barak Obama’s got it nailed down to a science . . . in one way, McCarthy took away the strongest possible tool (the word “Un-American”) making Barak’s job more difficult. But the words “Nazi,” “Brown-Shirt,” “Hitler,” “Swastika” and “Storm Trooper” seem to be doing the job for Obama quite nicely just as references to the “Hammer and Sickle” helped McCarthy. It really speeds up the process if the public already suspects YOUR straw-man really is an S.O.B. such as the obvious intolerance and bigotry of the right wing extremists in America . . . it doesn’t take much imagination to lump virtually all who would oppose YOU into bed with the worst of them . . . the beauty of it all of course is that by using Hitler’s propaganda method to associate the straw-man with Nazism, YOU’VE pre-empted the words . . . they canNOT be used by YOUR opposition against YOU nearly so effectively, ah, lovely, lovely.

Secondly, all governments not based expressly on MIGHT are based on words, a constitution, founding documents and the like. Words are nebulous things. Use words to undermine the authority of the document itself, like a martial artist turning the adversary’s striking force against him. For quite some time this process was used effectively by the slave-holding states from about 1816 to 1860 to continually bring up the issue of “states rights” and “natural rights” to bolster their position within the government and make it practically unassailable. However, the Civil War which southerners called “The War of Northern Aggression” and which was taught about under that name in many Southern schools right up until about 1970, brought MIGHT back into the equation. 

Should Maine or Georgia or Oregon decide tomorrow they wanted out of the Union and now, that starry-eyed notion would be opposed by Federal troops and tanks post-haste. Even Texas, the “Lone Star State” which expressly holds the legal right to secede from the country any time it wishes could NOT do so, MIGHT would triumph right in a heartbeat. So the attacks must be with words, words so clever that MIGHT never enters the picture, words that bring down the government as surely as ten million nuclear weapon strikes, words mightier than swords.

These “words mightier than swords” must appeal first of all, at least obliquely to “the things people are afraid of” and directly and constantly to the “edges” of things in the imagination. There are limits set in the Constitution and things just at the edge of the limits.   There are barriers to traditional and trusted power and things just at the edge of those barriers. The main order of business is to undermine the authority of the Constitution so that from a “call to action” standpoint it’s rendered innocuous, worse than useless for the opposition, because of course YOU will wield it often to make YOUR points and defend the “proto-edges” YOU’VE created and then attack the very foundations of the world the opposition is built upon. 

McCarthy used words from communism itself to undermine communism, or rather suspected or insinuated communism. Words like “comrade,” “proletariat,” “infiltration,” “revolution,” “fellow travelers,” and “classless society” are bandied about easily and can always be used to impugn an opponent’s patriotism. More importantly with these words YOU  find out who you can count on as allies. Early on Truman opposed McCarthy, but Joseph Kennedy and his son Robert and President Eisenhower aligned with him for several years until the whole country started to suspect his extremism and deplore his “unusual tactics.” It’s very easy to use words from Nazism and the Hitler years to attack people you label “Nazis.” But this is the light work . . . .

The real work lies in undermining the authority of the constitution by stretching the meaning and legal impact of words; by snatching up every ambiguity and claiming authority or better yet merely acting out on that authority to the utmost latitude; by exercising tiny acts of authority NOT guaranteed by the Constitution which at least YOUR own now numerous followers can approve of; if all of this is done with chutz pah (a bold assumption of undefined right or ‘constitutional prerogative’) much can be accomplished. By quibbling, parsing words and wielding esoteric distinctions to explain away the plain and obvious meanings (a la Bill Clinton when talking about Monica Lewinsky), the words quickly lose power. 

As the public sees first one such audacious encroachment after another without repercussion . . . a precedent is set and they become accustomed and ACCEPTING, however, begrudgingly of it and YOUR power. Every time these things are made good, the “WORD” is made less powerful. Seizing undefined constitutional powers or UNconstitutional powers adapted and stretched to the ultimate when using the “edge” principle mentioned above is a powerful tool that gets reinforced with every new success.

The lies, broken promises, half-truths and horrendous obfuscations of Obama and his main lieutenants Pelosi and Frank are legendary. The creation by Obama of 36 czars answerable to Obama and only to Obama sidestepping the FBI and other vetting and eliminating the need for the approval of the legislature is clearly unconstitutional. The orchestration of the Chrysler and GM bankruptcy by Obama and particularly the ignoring of the rights of the secured creditors such as the three Indiana pension funds and the establishment of major stock ownership by the Obama-supporting UAW violated 232 years of bankruptcy law and precedent.

His unprecedented decision to select a U.S. Supreme Court justice based upon “empathy” has no grounding in the Constitution. After the President’s lobbying for his point of view almost half of Americans think “empathy” is a wise and necessary requisite more important than knowledge of and dedication to the principles of established law.

He appears to be winning the battle allowing him to “personally oversee” the 2010 Census and he has expanded the funding for ACORN, or is trying to, to $8.5 Billion via economic stimulus funds. 

Mr. Obama intervened in the business of reforming the automobile industry shamelessly, personally “overseeing” that also. Imagine this: Chrysler and GM are getting roughly $15,000 a car in government bailouts . . . but they’re closing roughly 720 Chrysler dealerships and 1200 GM dealerships including many which despite all the problems were profitable before the bailout. What sense is there in that? Good question. Obama is nothing, if not sly, it seems that dealerships owned by Obama supporters, even ones who lose money are finding competition within 20 miles of them disappearing. It seems that dealerships owned by McCain supporters are being closed even if profitable and lacking competition in their immediate radius.

Thirdly, the opposition by now has replaced mere distaste with utter abhorrence perhaps even fear of YOU and YOUR method. Pay them no serious mind. The “utterly natural” assumption that everything YOU do is meant for the ultimate good of the country without once apologizing or retracing steps followed close upon by audacious attacks on the patriotism, goals and means, and character of YOUR opposition in line with the straw-man principle now accelerates. 

The Obama strategy is clearly to label all opposition as “stupid,” self-serving and somehow Nazi-ish.

Spies or investigators have been working all along to find the “skeletons” in their closets and attacking the most “righteous” and most importantly the most effective of the voices raised against YOU, YOUR methods and YOUR goals and accomplishments. Three or four such brutal responses will have a subtle quieting power upon would-be opposition. Who after all wants first to labeled a storm trooper and then brought down publically for his all too human mistakes? Words like “dangerous,” “unpatriotic,” “seditious” and self-serving” along with notions of moral weaknesses go a long way to make the opposition kowtow. Alluring to the opposition’s anti-Constitutional ways and goals and poor character as well as attacks with buzzwords like “Nazi” should have a proper suppressive effect upon political conversation and claims in opposition to YOUR own.

Fourth, external alignments and conversations “for the purpose of understanding” with YOUR (the country’s) heretofore enemies and an indifference to YOUR (the country’s) heretofore friends whose leaning might be along the lines of the Constitution YOU’RE discrediting will certainly make things easier. Judiciously finding areas of disagreement, in line with our Constitution to “prod” the former friends with, while embracing “for the purpose of open and honest discourse to promote reconciliation” former enemies will keep things in a fluid state that YOU can exploit.

The “rights” of terrorists are now more important than the rights of Americans to be safe within their own borders in ObamaWorld.   He undermines measures taken to protect the country. He uses interrogators who got vital information that protected Americans as propaganda pawns.  His kissing up to Chavez in Venezuela and giving DVDs of his speeches to our friends is absolutely indefensible.

Fifthly power and accomplishment and fame are all magnets, however fleeting. Therefore YOU MUST from the initial forays into the halls of power and government acquire “toadies.” The more rich, powerful, famous and accomplished the toady the better. But discourse among toadies is forbidden except along YOUR PARTY LINES. All equivocations and subtle disagreements with YOU, YOUR “stated goals” (not, of course the real goal of overthrowing and subverting the present system LOL) and YOUR stated means (no need to belabor the point that YOUR means are not necessarily worth revealing in all or in any case) canNOT ever be allowed. 

The more needy, clingy, true-believerish, fashionable and politically-correct the toady the easier it is to keep them in line. True-believers in the occult, pseudo-sciences and the power of government spending to bring about good in virtually every case are natural toadies and need to be cultivated, nurtured and rewarded directly from YOU. YOUR lieutenants are important to YOU but YOU MUST be the ONE doing the rewarding at least 90% of the time. Let YOUR lieutenants receive reward from YOU for effectively and verbatim carrying YOUR message of reward, but only on rare occasion. YOU MUST reward your lieutenants in some manner agreeable to them 30% - 40% of the time: too much reward gives them too much sense of power, too little reward is discouraging.

Besides their main appointed tasks, YOUR lieutenants are forever vigilant for opinion contrary to YOUR own. To this point the lieutenant MUST be effectively brainwashed to see YOUR ends as so crucial that virtually any means YOU enlist are justified because “We’re in a war here. Our opponents have no scruples the dirty Nazis (or whatever) and sometimes we have to fight back against bullets with bullets.” Etc., etc., etc.

YOU must create within your “classless society” several levels of distinction between YOUR toadies. The more uniformly in line with YOUR thinking and the more useful to YOU a toady is . . . the higher their “distinction” within YOUR operation. Rank and etiquette distinctions can enhance the power of such reward and this can be a function of your lieutenants. YOU, however, would occasionally hold ceremonies presided over by YOU to collectively honor such reward recipients.

While Obama and his toadies call fiscal conservatives and especially Republicans “stupid,” the lineup of environmental extremists, enamored celebrities and handout-seekers that make up the extreme left and extreme-extreme left of his supporting coalition clearly don’t have a brain among them. They still believe banning DDT was a great thing, although the original science was non-existent; no real studies have ever been done and DDT can demonstrably be drunk and used as salad dressing (albeit bad-tasting salad dressing) and has never been proven to hurt any human or any animal with two or four legs or any fish. 

Perhaps in hopes of drawing attention away from the intellectual paucity among his followers, Obama has surrounded himself with an “academic elite” all noteworthy for academic credentials that don’t translate into the real world outside the ivory towers. Many are crackpots such as his Science Czar Holdren whose recommendations for “forced abortions,” “secret mass sterilizations” via drinking water additives and admiration of the “science of eugenics” and negative population growth was published^^ for the whole world to see in the late ‘70’s. Other appointees clearly are unable to walk the walk of his and their talk. His Surgeon General Benjamin is an enormously fat lady whose acceptance speech was a sad litany of her own family’s irresponsible lifestyles:  smoking resulting in death; use of illegal drugs; depression, victimization by anti-health choices that brought on adult-onset diabetes, HIV, suicide and lung cancer.

His cabinet is far left and impractical beyond belief. They believe the cabinet is an acceptable testing ground for their radical ideas. Legislation is an acceptable way to totally and immediately shift national priorities and even morality.  Hence cometh: “cap and trade” and “Obamacare.”  Obamacare's provisions bring us the nanny-state shepherded in by radical feminists in the guise of social workers (78% of social workers are female; most are liberal and about half of them feminists).

Sixth, public opinion is a powerful thing. Without ever apologizing . . . it becomes necessary to get the wider public tolerating YOU and YOUR visible METHODS and YOUR stated goals. It’s all done, after all, for their good. Quoting from or alluding to the Bible and popular tales and myths, etc. to feelings of justice and fairness and necessity should be constantly employed to allay suspicion, or worse fear. YOU are to be respected and loved by the general public . . . a bit of fear for the opposition is, naturally a good thing.

Obama’s most recent ploy is to convene a teleconference of churches and employ Biblical quotations like “bearing false witness” repeatedly during the speech. Since the man is a testament to the awesome power of bearing false witness, he protesth too much.

Seventh, have a system in place to control the voting system at appropriate times that is the culmination of YOUR work: the CONTROL they will give YOU. But more importantly CONTROL and manipulate the purse strings on a daily basis. This is YOUR real POWER-BASE, the banking system and the legislature’s purse strings. This is the most fundamental way to REWARD YOUR MOST IMPORTANT ENABLERS: YOUR sponsors.

His election was engineered by the winning of 13 primary states by illegal means. 13 of the 14 caucus states were won by Obama despite the fact that he lost the voting in 8 of the 11 dual purpose states (voting and caucusing both took place). It began with illegal busing non Iowa citizens across the state line from Illinois and it included strong arm tactics against Hillary Clinton that were repeatedly documented on the internet and in news stories in print and on air. He now controls the voting, by holding votes on huge pendulous legislation which no one has read; or perhaps which have NOT entirely been written yet. He has twice held secret votes at times not scheduled for legislating meeting (any forum is acceptable, right?) and he’s been pressing for Obamacare a bill that is not yet finalized; (indeed there are five versions being hammered out) as if it were a finished product that some one person might actually know what the hell is in it.

Mr. Bernanke is definitely in Obama’s pocket: he has recently multiplied the circulating currency in this country by a factor of 15 to 1. If that continues, then your January, 2009 one dollar bill will be worth less about 6 ½ to 7 cents in buying power.

Mr. Obama is meting out stimulus money very slowly . . . Why? Because while just to apportion it fairly based upon either need or population or both might make things go very efficiently, that would NOT suit his purposes. By a 2/1 ratio, Obama is rewarding counties that voted for him with stimulus funds over counties that did not . . . to do this a justification must be created in virtually every case that would stand up to legal challenge: tough work and slow work, hence the tediously slow distribution of funds except to some crucial foot soldiers like ACORN.

The immense amount of bailout and stimulus money is only trickling into the economy one teeny drop at a time. The president seems to be attempting to win future votes with this money and borrowed money (his 2009 budget deficit is close to four times that of George W. Bush in 2008. When questioned about these matters, Mr. Obama replies virtually uniformly in a morally superior manner, implying the wisdom of his actions and the need to be compassionate for the downtrodden of society and to establish a more caring and moral social structure. Didn’t G.H.W. Bush get laughed at in the media for talking about a “kinder-gentler society?” Why isn’t this considered funny now?

Eighth, a private standing army (for security purposes only) is the penultimate testament to YOUR power. The ultimate testament is when YOUR private army is accepted as necessary and desirable by the public at large. Even though, especially because there is no apparent reason for its creation . . . this is a must. Create alarm, more straw-men and scapegoats, and nebulous threats to the country’s security.

Mr. Obama has discussed on several occasions the vital need for “an independent force equal to but separate from the regular army created to deal with special security issues now threatening to arise.” He has talked about mobilizing the country immediately and the need for a “special force” to respond immediately to the swine flu threat or other serious national emergencies.

Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,

Rajjpuut